• Blog
    • Latest Posts
    • News
    • Featured Videos
    • Deals
  • About
  • Camera User Groups
    • ARRI
      • User Videos
      • News & Deals
      • Related Posts
    • Blackmagic
      • User Videos
      • News & Deals
      • Related Posts
    • Canon
      • Canon Cinema EOS
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Canon 5D Mark III/IV
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Canon Rebel/70D/80D
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
    • Panasonic
      • Panasonic GH5
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Panasonic GH4
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Panasonic GH3
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
    • Sony
      • Sony a7-Series
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony CineAlta
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony PXW-FS7
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony PXW-FS5
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony NEX-FS700
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony NEX-FS100
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony NEX-VG10/20/30
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
    • Z CAM
      • User Videos
      • News & Deals
      • Related Posts
    • RigShots
  • VR
    • Daily Digest
    • Videos IN VR
    • Videos ON VR
    • Latest Posts
    • News & Deals
  • DOCOFILM
    • Newsletter
    • Latest News
    • Featured Videos
  • Essays on Film
  • Adobe Premiere Tips
Menu
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
    • News
    • Featured Videos
    • Deals
  • About
  • Camera User Groups
    • ARRI
      • User Videos
      • News & Deals
      • Related Posts
    • Blackmagic
      • User Videos
      • News & Deals
      • Related Posts
    • Canon
      • Canon Cinema EOS
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Canon 5D Mark III/IV
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Canon Rebel/70D/80D
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
    • Panasonic
      • Panasonic GH5
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Panasonic GH4
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Panasonic GH3
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
    • Sony
      • Sony a7-Series
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony CineAlta
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony PXW-FS7
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony PXW-FS5
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony NEX-FS700
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony NEX-FS100
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
      • Sony NEX-VG10/20/30
        • User Videos
        • News & Deals
        • Related Posts
    • Z CAM
      • User Videos
      • News & Deals
      • Related Posts
    • RigShots
  • VR
    • Daily Digest
    • Videos IN VR
    • Videos ON VR
    • Latest Posts
    • News & Deals
  • DOCOFILM
    • Newsletter
    • Latest News
    • Featured Videos
  • Essays on Film
  • Adobe Premiere Tips

Category: FocusPulling Original Video

04 September 2019

Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K: Footage & Review

Written by Paul Moon

By now, the dust has settled after Blackmagic Design dropped their latest bomb, the 6K version of their Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera that uses Canon EF-mount lenses. The product was ready to ship upon its announcement (compared to waiting months after that 4K launch), and just as quickly, this space got flooded with anxious, speedy reviews that tended, as usual, to be binary: buy it, or not?

Well, let’s slow down and most importantly watch a formal test shoot, closer to real-world usage. The featured video here builds upon practices learned (often painfully) using the BMPCC4K, because they’re almost exactly the same camera. Also importantly, it’s shot in the way I’d shoot something I care about (as I’ll be using much of this in a new addition to “Whitman on Film”): following formal cinematography principles in framing, exposure and color. As I note in the optional commentary (or, you can just mute it!), the footage is essentially raw from raw: I ingested the Blackmagic RAW (BRAW) 6K footage using Autokroma’s BRAW Studio plugin (about which I created a long-form tutorial), to stay within my preferred NLE Adobe Premiere Pro, but I did not apply any plug-in, or even Lumetri Color. Given the nature of raw video in a log profile, it’s a mandatory step to coddle the footage with source-level adjustments to luminance and chrominance clip-by-clip, so I essentially color-graded — and applied the official Blackmagic LUT — at the BRAW Studio level by only adjusting the raw metadata. It’s really a faithful representation of the camera’s base capability without interference. Normally I’m tempted to stack something like FilmConvert for stock emulation (even though that causes most of my crashes), but this was a camera test, not art.

So, the images speak for themselves (and I speak over them, about some key issues). But the following written sections dive into a few trailing subjects that you may be interested in.

CANON EF MOUNT & SUPER 35MM-ISH SENSOR

The permanent adage holds, that you will/should spend way more effort + money on building your lens arsenal, than any given camera body. So the choice of camera is radically affected by your current lens kit, right? Of course. That’s the number one hugest factor why you’d go for the BMPCC6K, apart from the bump in resolution and sensor size, if you’re already a Canon user. In general, investing in EF-mount glass (especially for cine lenses) is the better proposition, because it adapts down to just about anything (E-mount, Micro Four Thirds, etc.) due to its outdated gigantic flange distance that was originally designed to accommodate deep inset single-lens-reflex prismatic shutters (i.e., something irrelevant to video). Also, lots of EF-mount glass is full-frame (compared to EF-S crop), which gets you ready for that inevitable time when we’re all finally shooting full frame, like I do on my Sony a7 III whenever I want better low-light sensitivity and depth-of-field latitude, if I can live with Sony’s inferior 8-bit 4:2:0 H.264-based codec.

So yeah, longer flange distance, and bigger sensor coverage, are in the plus column for EF-mount and the BMPCC6K. But in practical application, I see little difference between the Pocket 4K and 6K mounts, and sensors. I already have a toxic stew of EF, MFT, and E-mount glass, and since these Blackmagic cameras lack in-body image stabilization at the sensor, in-lens optical image stabilization (O.I.S.) is especially critical given the Pockets’ ornery form factors (e.g., no third point of contact without an eyepiece). MFT lenses have a distinguished history of nailing O.I.S., generally better than EF lenses, and if we really do care about the Pocket being (nearly) pocketable, MFT lenses are also more portable. (Many blogger types also emphasize here, that focal reducer mount adapters, including but not limited to Metabones, further close the gap between these models. Yet I’m personally, permanently averse to sandwiching more layers of glass between sensor and lens, and risking incompatibility where modern lenses rely upon electronic control of aperture and focus. Basically, native-lenses-or-bust is a smart practical decision; life is short.)

As to sensor size, it was never so simple. I was getting bad vignetting at the 12mm end of a MFT zoom lens on the BMPCC4K, because that camera’s sensor is simply bigger than a typical MFT sensor, especially if you’re shooting in DCI aspect. Meantime, Super35mm was never an exact measurement, including variances like APS-C, and so the difference in sensor size further narrows — both still far away from full frame. And after increasing resolution on the BMPCC6K sensor, the photosites are more dense and less sensitive. All told, low-light capability is basically a wash. Same for control over depth of field. Whichever aperture value you choose relative to lens quality, is practically everything (especially given the bonus feature of dual native ISO).

TOO DARN HOT VS. HVAC

One of the biggest surprises, arriving into the BMPCC6K, was its substantially bigger fan/ventilation, compared to the BMPCC4K which actually didn’t ever produce reports of overheating. Maybe the marginal resolution bump demands enough extra number crunching to push the chassis into furnace territory, but an obvious concern now is weatherproofing. I don’t shoot for NatGeo or anything, so maybe it doesn’t matter much, but what I did run into is the fairly universal need to mount the camera onto a tripod, using a common quick-release plate such as the Manfrotto seen at right. All that’s left is to poke it out the back, to avoid blocking circulation, which really throws things off balance especially if you’re mounting a heavy lens. But there’s a little good news, at least: the fan is whisper-quiet, even when it’s hot outside and when your shot runs long.

COMPATIBLE STORAGE MEDIA

Let’s start with the complaint that CFast 2.0 cards are just too expensive and too scarce, if we have other options. And we do. The obvious choice is simply to plug a portable SSD into the BMPCC6K’s USB-C port. I’ve done that on my BMPCC4K, but it required some awkward rigging, with both a cage, and a proprietary SSD mounting sled — going even farther away from a “pocket.” But for this shoot, I really needed to run-and-gun, powering off those short-lived LP-E6 batteries by simply stashing one-half dozen best-in-class knock-offs into my pockets. I actually burned through only half of them; when shooting short bursts (e.g., gathering coverage, etc.), freed from the liability of missing one second out of unrepeatable minutes, those Canon batteries work out just fine (and the new battery sled designed for the 4K, will work on the 6K). But, what about portable storage media?

Same strategy: buy a bucketful. Strangely, there’s just one sensible option on the market at this time, pictured here. Reason is, if you avoid CFast 2.0, and go with UHS-II as the internal alternate, it’s critical to buy the speed class labeled “V90” which guarantees a minimum sequential write speed of 90 megabytes per second; theoretically, this Transcend reaches 180 megabytes per second for headroom, but you’ll need as much speed as you can get for both ProRes and BRAW at 6K resolution. (And it doesn’t hurt that the read speeds, when properly connected via USB 3.2 Gen.2 UHS-II card readers, go through the roof as pictured at right.) Weirdly, at this spec Transcend maxes out at the 64 GB capacity, but it’s stunningly cheap at around fifty bucks each, while competing higher-capacity cards offer bad cost-per-gigabyte value — and if you can manage it, there’s wisdom to breaking apart your shooting day into multiple smaller cards, reducing risk of loss anyway. Given the extraordinary efficiency of BRAW at reasonable compromise ratios like 12:1, you’d be surprised how much can fit onto a 64 GB card (I got about a one-third-hour) — everything you see in the video here, fit onto about three of them. But…

WHICH CODEC? THIS TIME, IT DEPENDS

I’m on a mission to kill ProRes, which is an unspeakable offense among the Church of Jobs, but let’s get real: it’s a monstrously inefficient codec, originally designed as a technology compromise for slow Apple computers to keep up in Final Cut as an intermediate codec. It was never meant to be an acquisition codec (i.e., shooting video), but for a while, it was the best we had, starting with the Atomos Shogun. Yet now we have BRAW, which fundamentally moots ProRes — especially now that Autokroma’s BRAW Studio gets the stuff seamlessly into Adobe Premiere. Case closed!

Well, no. When you really think about it, raw means raw: if you want to store what you shoot into a format that doesn’t match the native sensor specs, given any manageably simple conversion formula . . . then it’s raw no more. So with this BMPCC6K, the odd result is that you can shoot full 6K footage in BRAW, but if you want to shoot standard 4K-DCI or 4K-UHD footage, you’re stuck with ProRes. You can see this in the available menu options above, between resolution and codec combinations. It’s really frustrating! When you consider how 4K-UHD is now the standard benchmark resolution, having this camera that can’t shoot natively into its benchmark BRAW codec, is a real limitation. And it offsets the argument that many are making (and have acted upon), to upgrade from a BMPCC4K to a BMPCC6K.

Yet ultimately, are we any worse off shooting 6K?

6K: WHY NOT (AND WHY)?

The first, gut reaction to any 6K camera arriving in 2019 — Blackmagic is soon joined by the Z CAM E2-S6 and the Panasonic S1H — is that no one watches content in 6K. Of course, but once you’re past that, it comes down to over-capturing resolution into the actual video footage, to reap the benefits when you finally render out to UHD or even HD (besides the other benefit of being able to crop in post). Storing more resolution than you’ll eventually watch, is better than: in-camera reading out more resolution than you’ll watch, and down-converting it to a lower resolution for storage. That’s literally the history of bad video cameras, dating back to the high-megapixel sensor of the Canon 5D Mark II designed for stills, bayering badly down to two-megapixel HD video footage with harsh aliasing, etc.

One of my favorite reveals to film school students, is that the classic ARRI Alexa that still shoots the majority of all movies we watch today, doesn’t even record in 4K. Does that mean my Samsung Note10+ shoots better video at UHD+? The weird conclusion is, resolution matters and yet it doesn’t: the reason the Alexa looks so amazing, is that its sensor and processor deliver such immaculate definition and color science for every precious photosite — fewer, but better. But! When you don’t have/can’t afford an Alexa, there’s no getting around the fact that a wide shot with lots of tiny little tree leaves fluttering in the background, look better from the BMPCC6K, than from the BMPCC4K, when their respective maximum resolution footage gets scaled down to HD. This compensates for its lack of elite ARRI juice.

True, 6K footage takes a lot more grinding to churn through. Last month I built a new workstation around the epic Intel-killing AMD Ryzen Zen2 3900x (ignore Puget Systems), paired with Nvidia’s new RTX 1070, and this 6K footage flies fast off my PCIe SSDs. But that’s not a typical workstation, and you might end up needing to use proxies. Even with my Death Star machine, Adobe Premiere crashed — of course — reporting that it was a GPU error, which is just Adobe saying as usual, “not our fault!” But I had applied no GPU-accelerated effects, besides Adobe’s own Warp for which they hold sole responsibility. Point being, computer editing technology keeps crawling neck-and-neck, barely keeping up with this Moore’s Law-like rise in video resolution where 6K is becoming the norm — 8K is next. We keep needing to carefully balance our demands and values, against the rage of tearing our hair out.

GETTING EXPENSIVE: PARTY OVER?

Speaking of which, in life, when things seem too good to be true, they freaking are. The BMPCC4K is $1,295, and the BMPCC6K, double that. What’s different, performance-wise? A little more resolution — but not even doubling down across the whole feature set. Another fact: notice how the 6K is being shot out like T-shirts at a baseball game, but the 4K still has a line going outside the stadium since the past year? Business is business: there’s more profit in a camera that rakes in twice as much, but costs hardly any more to make (with most of the R&D already sunk into the first one).

It’s totally unfair and unreliable to prophesy that Blackmagic is the next Apple, becoming a beloved boutique brand that simply cannot afford not to become unaffordable (!). But I’ll never forget seeing that fancy new keyboard at NAB, thinking to myself “Blackmagic being Blackmagic again!” expecting a $100 price tag . . . then, seeing it’s the most expensive QWERTY keyboard known to humankind, at $1k. If RED folds under the weight of their extraordinary arrogance soon, Blackmagic will further dominate the market (and most of us cannot afford ARRI anyway). Is China next, after these years down under? I’ve got Z CAM’s new E2C and will be posting a review here soon.

This is a render from an unprocessed, straight-to-storage still frame capture on the BMPCC6K. By clicking this image, you can download the original raw DNG file, and process it yourself.
September 4, 2019 Blackmagic Cinema Cameras, Camera User Groups, FocusPulling Original, FocusPulling Original Video Leave a Comment
06 June 2019

Production Notes on “Drum-Taps” for Walt Whitman’s Bicentennial

Written by Paul Moon

This past weekend, my new film Drum-Taps premiered at the Walt Whitman 200 Festival here in Washington, D.C. on the poet’s actual 200th birthday, complementing the half-hour video essay I recently posted here via whitmanonfilm.com. For this one-person shoot (besides the actor), the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K enabled an efficient and high-performance workflow over the course of three half-days in Virginia, from rural to urban. Blackmagic RAW (BRAW) 5:1 gave me lots of valuable latitude in post-production, for the composite effect used throughout its running time:  a classic double-exposure technique, using the Soft Light blend mode on the top layer with talent on-screen, and 50% opacity on the bottom layer with that talent removed, always locked down on a tripod without any panning or tilting (so that the shots would match).  The codec’s inherent efficiency kept the whole shoot under 500 GB using a single connected Samsung T5 SSD, which is extraordinary for RAW performance.

Using Autokroma’s plug-in for Premiere, the BRAW footage played back faster even than ProRes, let alone common H.264-based codecs like AVCHD and XAVC-S.  This was the first major project I had taken on using entirely the BRAW Studio plug-in, after creating the above tutorial that remains the most comprehensive guide available.  This added even more confidence that BRAW Studio is a real solution for using the codec in Premiere; perhaps it’ll become one of those things Adobe can’t resist buying out, from a third-party developer, like they did with virtual reality effects from Mettle that are now native, and Lumetri color altogether that is now so deeply ingrained into every Premiere workflow.

As for the color grade, since I still refuse to round-trip out to DaVinci Resolve (avoiding generation loss), I’m still experimenting with the unpredictable difference between dumping Lumetri and FilmConvert onto the clips at the Source level using Effect Controls, versus later “stacking” of color correction onto sequences at the Timeline downstream.  In general, I’m seeing benefits to avoiding color tweaks using the BRAW Studio controls at all; putting Lumetri next in the stack; then finally letting FilmConvert take care of both the LUT conversion from log, and of course film emulation simulation.  But if the shots had included more complicated motion, requiring keyframed changes to color parameters, I would have had to do all of my color work downstream in the Timeline for sure.

I appreciated the native DCI aspect ratio for cinema presentation (especially now that film festivals increasingly prefer DCP presentation at DCI aspect), which is the one mode on the BMPCC4K that uses the whole sensor (whereas the UHD recording mode is actually windowed).  And the camera’s four-microphone array did a fine job at capturing footsteps and other ambient sounds that surprisingly obviated the need for using any secondary audio.

As a mostly outdoor shoot, always with daylight color temperature, ND filtration was critical, and that actually caused problems.  Two solid brands of variable ND filters actually vignetted badly at times, proving that the BMPCC4K’s sensor is making more use of Micro Four Thirds glass, straight to the farthest edges (whenever at the widest focal lengths).  This makes sense when you consider the crop factor of the BMPCC4K is about 1.9, a little lower than the typical MFT sensor.  That partly explains the better light sensitivity, and the extra pixels offered, from the native DCI aspect dual ISO sensor.

Given the run-and-gun nature of the shoot too, I opted for zoom lenses most of the time for fastest re-framing/composition.  Nothing deluxe there, just my two workhorses:  the Panasonic Lumix 12-35mm f/2.8, and the Olympus 12-100mm f/4.0.  Because of the composite nature of the simpler wide angles here, depth of field wasn’t a big part of the equation, but where I did need to narrow that down, I hooked on the cheapo Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 prime and it performed just fine.  We’re talking 4K video here, not still photography.

There are just two drone shots in the film, using what remains the best drone available for prosumers, that ironically isn’t being sold anymore (DJI Phantom 4 Pro V2.0).  The second shot was a nice excuse to try out the new Content Aware Fill tool in After Effects, to create a second layer to enable the soldier’s semi-opacity.  It goes by quickly enough, that it did the job (if you don’t notice the street bricks looking weird)!  But just like Morph Cut, it’s really hit-or-miss after the honeymoon period’s over.

In all, while this kind of smaller and more independent production continues to rise in standards and audience reach, tools like the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K fill an increasingly important niche, acting as the central filmmaking tool.  Put another way:  it’s not just a toy after all.  I have better gear back at the studio, but for this shoot, I couldn’t have done better.  And it all fit in a backpack.

June 6, 2019 Blackmagic Cinema Cameras, FocusPulling Original Video Leave a Comment
22 May 2019

Whitman on Film: a video essay at the poet’s bicentennial

Written by Paul Moon

[This is the full transcript of the video essay “Whitman on Film” that tops this page, but as an interactive feature, when you click on any of the still frames below (twice, please), only that relevant portion will play back.]

Walt Whitman might be the best known poet in print, not to mention in film and television through the years.  In 2019, we’re celebrating his 200th birthday, reconciling his legacy across two centuries of American history, and his influence on media beyond the printed word.  From silent movies of the early 20th century, to episodic dramas on television today, I’m focusing here on the poet showing up in cinema and television – and since the lines are blurred by now, I’m just calling this “Whitman on Film” (and I’ve created a companion site for this video essay too, at whitmanonfilm.com, adding my new Whitman trilogy of original poetry films).

Born May 31, 1819, Walt Whitman came of age surrounded with new technology and American enterprise, something he celebrated with joy, taking full advantage as a writer.  His lifetime magnum opus “Leaves of Grass” started out as a true “song of himself,” self-published and launched with rave reviews that he wrote anonymously about himself!  Sometimes-professor James Franco once wrote an article suggesting that Whitman was the original Kanye West.  And there’s no doubting that Walt would have just loved the Internet, if he had it.

But photography was the newest thing in his time, and so we have lots of pictures of the bearded poet, and also the Civil War that most dramatically defined his era.  Movies weren’t invented yet, so we can’t see him that way – but we can hear his actual voice in a wax cylinder recording that was probably captured personally by Thomas Edison in 1890.

When I made my own trilogy of Whitman poetry films, I started out with that recording of his voice in “America” – and it’s a curious bit of trivia that Daniel Day-Lewis studied the recording to estimate a New Yorker’s accent mid-19th century.

Intolerance (1915)

But it wasn’t until the 20th century, after Whitman’s death in 1892, that cinema came of age – the ultimate medium of sight, sound and word.  Much of that birth was ugly, consummated in D. W. Griffith’s 1915 “Birth of a Nation” that reflected back on the Civil War of Whitman’s time, filled with Lost Cause racism that actually inspired protests from day one.  Ever the provocateur, Griffith followed that up casting himself as a sort of victim with “Intolerance” one year later, and the first thing seen is a direct allusion to the Whitman poem, “Out of the Cradle Endlessly Rocking.”  So technically, that’s the first big example of Whitman on Film.

Manhatta (1921)

But really, it starts with the masterpiece called “Manhatta” in 1921.  It’s the kind of film that I love the most, called “city symphonies,” and this one arrived even before the seminal German and Russian archetypes, leading up to our time with modern American examples like “Koyaanisqatsi.”  Living somewhere between narrative and documentary cinema, and before the arrival of sound and much else, “Manhatta” uses intertitles to excerpt Whitman’s famous New York poems:  “A Broadway Pageant,” “Mannahatta,” and “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry.”

It was just six years later in 1927 that the first sound film arrived, “The Jazz Singer,” and by 1931, we get Whitman in spoken word.  “Street Scene” was an adaptation of a Pulitzer Prize-winning play that dug into the urban and cultural dramas of immigrant New York, using the transcendent longing found in Whitman’s poem “Passage to India.”

Street Scene (1931)

Sail forth—steer for the deep waters only,
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me,
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.

And then in 1942, still in sea-faring metaphor, Bette Davis reads from “The Untold Want” in “Now Voyager.”

Now Voyager (1942)

The untold want by life and land ne’er granted,
Now voyager sail thou forth to seek and find.

It’s almost as if Whitman is giving these not-fully-actualized characters, permission to become whole.

But even Whitman’s transcendent qualities could manage to kindle an old romance, adding a bit of melancholy to Joan Crawford’s performance in the 1951 film “Goodbye, My Fancy” that’s named directly after Whitman’s poem.

Goodbye, My Fancy (1951)

Good-bye my Fancy!
Farewell dear mate, dear love!
I’m going away, I know not where,
Or to what fortune, or whether I may ever see you again,
So Good-bye my Fancy.

Twilight Zone: Season 3, Episode 35 (1962)

Also getting its name from a Whitman poem, but much less direct in allusion, is Ray Bradbury’s one script that he wrote for “The Twilight Zone” and later adapted into a literary short story that became his legend.  Much like the year of its broadcast 1962, the story was innocent to technology, happy to “Sing the Body Electric” if only that could be a manifestation of the human soul.

But heading into the 60s and 70s, America went into a period of soul-searching, which explains a certain long absence of Whitman on film.  It might be that his romanticism went out of fashion too, against the rise of beat poets and politicized art.

Fame (1980)

So then it’s almost a cry for help, by the time we get to 1980, when the musical “Fame” goes back to that “Body Electric” poem in a very different world than mid-century Twilight Zone.  With “Fame,” after stories of suffering and identity crisis, the film ends with a bombastic musical arrangement of Whitman’s body celebration – maybe heralding a more self-obsessed version of the poet’s transcendent humanism.  And that was way before Twitter and Facebook.

After 1980, Whitman gets back in fashion.  Maybe it’s Reagan’s “shining city on a hill,” or just that the war is over, but his poetry starts serving many functions.

Sophie’s Choice (1982)

In “Sophie’s Choice,” reflecting on America’s past, Whitman is treated with a sort of archival reverence.

But what also began to blow open around that time, after the fall of the studio system, was the emergence of more independent cinema, like this peculiar film by Jim Jarmusch called “Down by Law” where Roberto Benigni recites “The Singer in the Prison,” in his native Italian.

Down By Law (1986)

So movies didn’t have to be epics, and could live in those long silences between words.  They could even put Whitman’s poetry into the most unexpected places – until you realize that the poet actually wrote a lot about the sport of baseball, as Susan Sarandon explains in the opening and closing minutes of 1988’s “Bull Durham.”

When she comes around to reciting “I Sing the Body Electric,” it’s a kinkier way of addressing the poetry, setting the stage to say things about gender that even Walt, way ahead of his time, probably couldn’t touch.

Bull Durham (1988)

I sing the body electric,
The armies of those I love engirth me and I engirth them,
They will not let me off till I go with them, respond to them,
And discorrupt them, and charge them full with the charge of the soul.
…
But the expression of a well-made man appears not only in his face,
It is in his limbs and joints also, it is curiously in the joints of his hips and wrists…
…
…love-flesh swelling and deliciously aching,
Limitless limpid jets of love hot and enormous…

But for better or worse, every appearance of Whitman on film up to this point, added together, couldn’t come close to the impact of just one movie.

For a few generations, “Dead Poets Society” became the entry point into Walt Whitman.  But its use of “O Captain! My Captain!” wasn’t quite an homage to Abraham Lincoln; it just became the nickname for a teacher who subverted authority, in a place of exaggerated authoritarianism.

Dead Poets Society (1989)

Oh me! Oh life! of the questions of these recurring,
Of the endless trains of the faithless, of cities fill’d with the foolish,
…
What good amid these, O me, O life?
Answer.  That you are here—that life exists and identity,
That the powerful play goes on, and you may contribute a verse.

Even if it was hard to sympathize with, or relate to privileged kids “suffering” at an elite boarding school, the film warmly depicted that spark when creativity sets loose, surrounded with a climate of adolescent male ambiguity that just barely started becoming permissible to examine in the late 80s.

And far away from rich boarding schools, was Northern Exposure’s small-town Alaska.  It was an early example of episodic television starting to look like cinema, challenging mass media’s safest boundaries.

Northern Exposure: Season 1, Episode 2 (1990)

When lilacs last in the dooryard bloom’d,
And the great star early droop’d in the western sky in the night…

What felt special here, compared to D. W. Griffith’s loud and ironic call for tolerance, is how common folk rose up and embraced the enlightenment of old Walt.

Around this time, mainstream Hollywood sometimes gave us reminders that Whitman is among America’s giants.

A long string of formulaic comedies in the 90s sometimes just appropriated the poet for comic opportunity.

Doc Hollywood (1991)

Out of the cradle endlessly rocking,
Out of the mocking-bird’s throat, the musical shuttle,
Out of the Ninth-month midnight,
Over the sterile sands and the fields beyond, where the child leaving his bed wander’d alone, bareheaded, barefoot,
Down from the shower’d halo,
Up from the mystic play of shadows…

Other times, they’d manage to add character gravitas, whether you’d call it homage, or just writer’s block.

You shall no longer take things at second or third hand, nor look through the eyes of the dead, nor feed on the spectres in books,
You shall not look through my eyes either, nor take things from me,
You shall listen to all sides, and filter them from yourself.

In “With Honors,” Joe Pesci is a party animal, poet-philosopher, and tragic character all in one.

With Honors (1994)

To drive free! to love free!
…To court destruction with taunts—
…
To feed the remainder of life with one hour of fulness and freedom! With one brief hour of madness and joy.
…
I am of old and young, of the foolish as much as the wise,
Regardless of others, ever regardful of others…

Bouncing back to historical drama, “Little Women” depicts contemporaneous adoration of the poet in his lifetime.

Little Women (1994)

Keep your woods, O Nature, and the quiet places by the woods;
…
give me the streets of Manhattan!

But then all of a sudden, Whitman shows up as an actual character for the first time.  In a pair of low-budget short films, actor Rip Torn played the poet in very speculative historical dramas, that gravitated towards the idea of a banished immoral man.

Beautiful Dreamers (1992)

What left little to the imagination anymore, was Whitman’s widely known companionship with other men, being directly portrayed.

And then, reaching a much bigger audience, “Dr. Quinn Medicine Woman” dedicated one whole episode to a made-up story of Walt Whitman recovering from a stroke, in their Colorado town.

Afoot and light-hearted I take to the open road,
Healthy, free, the world before me,
The long brown path before me leading wherever I choose.
…
Now I see the secret of the making of the best persons,
It is to grow in the open air and to eat and sleep with the earth.
…
Camerado, I give you my hand!
I give you my [love] more precious than money…

Part of that recovery works out to be a visit from Peter Doyle, whom historians believe Whitman loved later in life.  And of course, the town gossip rises to a boil.

It’s tough not to snicker at the clichés of this network television drama; but to see Whitman visually personified, portraying boundless optimism this way, it’s sort of irresistible.

Dr. Quinn Medicine Woman: Season 5, Episode 21 (1997)

By the end, some more tolerant folks in the community attend a makeshift reading where the poet recites that idealized paean to the Western frontier, “I Hear America Singing.”  When you consider the time and the context of Jane Seymour’s wholesome family drama, credit’s due where this episode got a huge audience thinking about something they normally wouldn’t.

I hear America singing, the varied carols I hear,
Those of mechanics, each one singing his as it should be blithe and strong,
The carpenter singing his as he measures his plank or beam,
The mason singing his as he makes ready for work,
…
The shoemaker singing as he sits on his bench,
…
Each singing what belongs to him or her and to none else,
…
There was a child went forth every day;
…
And all the changes of city and country, wherever he went.
…
These became part of that child who went forth every day, and who now goes, and will always go forth every day.

But for a different kind of audience entirely, independent filmmakers kept doing their thing, ever more liberated.  “Love and Death on Long lsland” is a 1997 film about a gender-fluid love triangle, including a recitation of “The Untold Want.”

The untold want, by life and land ne’er granted,
Now, Voyager, sail thou forth, to seek and find.

L.I.E., or Long Island Expressway, is a disturbing 2001 film starring a young Paul Dano being pursued by an old man, but in this scene, he manipulates back, reciting “Out of the Cradle Endlessly Rocking.”

Is it indeed toward your mate you sing? or is it mostly to me?
For I, that was a child, my tongue’s use sleeping,
Now I have heard you,
Now in a moment I know what I am for—I awake,
…
Never more the cries of unsatisfied love be absent from me, Never again leave me to be the peaceful child I was before…
…
[What there] under the yellow and sagging moon,
The messenger there arous’d—the fire, the sweet hell within,
The unknown want, the destiny of me.

Right up there with “Dead Poets Society,” another film reached a massive audience, maybe hearing Whitman’s words for the first time too, but since then, time hasn’t been friendly.  “The Notebook” was a hyper-romanticized melodrama, and it ultimately makes people swoon, or just cringe.

The Notebook (2004)

The real poems, (what we call poems being merely pictures,)
The poems of the privacy of the night, and of men like me,
This poem, drooping shy and unseen, that I always carry, and that all men carry…

From Ryan Gosling’s brooding read of “Spontaneous Me,” to the senior moment in “Continuities,” Whitman seems to fix everything.  Or, doesn’t.

Nothing is ever really lost, or can be lost,
…
The body, sluggish, aged, cold—the embers left from earlier fires,
…
shall duly flame again…

But in 2009, we get a movie that’s simply about getting high.  Or so you’d think from the title, a play on words, where Edward Norton oddly plays two characters.  He finds his muse in an earthy Keri Russell, who recites Whitman’s poem “To You.”

Leaves of Grass (2009)

You have not known what you are, you have slumber’d upon yourself all your life,
Your eyelids have been the same as closed most of the time,
What you have done returns already in mockeries,
…
The mockeries are not you,
Underneath them and within them I see you lurk…

But if Whitman on film is a generational thing, I’ve noticed that most people recently say they heard him in “Breaking Bad.”  It was an arc across multiple seasons and episodes, adding an air of mystery.  The main character’s name Walter White clearly shadows the name Walt Whitman, and he gets a copy of “Leaves of Grass” after hearing “When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer.”

That book shows up again when things are looking up for Walt, affirmed by “Song of Myself.”

Breaking Bad (2011-2013)

Another episode has the name “Gliding Over All,” the name of a Whitman poem too, where the book adds more plot intrigue.

Somewhere more brutal, we can guess that a vision of birds in the sky, allude to the poem “The Dalliance of Eagles”; and in the last episode of the whole series, there’s a moment of escape that sounds like the “barbaric yawp” from “Song of Myself.”

America (2018)

And with that, we’re more or less up to date in 2019.  For this bicentennial, I wrapped up a trilogy of poetry films that set Whitman’s “America,” “The Wound Dresser,” and other Civil War poems.  And no doubt, it won’t be long before another Whitman poem sneaks up on you somewhere, in this new world of endless options from streaming platforms to movie houses.  If this video essay has managed to sum up almost every appearance of Whitman on Film to date, you could rightly say it didn’t look very diverse – it didn’t portray all the faces of America that Whitman prophesied.  In “Poets to Come,” visualized here by my student Sara Wolfley in film school, the poet wrote:

Not to-day is to justify me and answer what I am for,
But you, a new brood, native, athletic, continental, greater than before known,
Arouse! for you must justify me.

I myself but write one or two indicative words for the future,
I but advance a moment only to wheel and hurry back in the darkness.

I am a man who, sauntering along without fully stopping, turns a
casual look upon you and then averts his face,
Leaving it to you to prove and define it,
Expecting the main things from you.

Poets to Come (2019)

So it’s well and good to honor Walt Whitman on his 200th birthday.  But what he really wanted to know is, what poem is there within you, waiting to tell?

May 22, 2019 FocusPulling Original, FocusPulling Original Video 3 Comments
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • PGYTECH OneGo 2 Backpack Review
  • DJI Osmo 360 | touring Washington DC
  • PGYTECH OneMo 2: this might be your ultimate backpack
  • DJI RS 3: Essential accessories for the best all-around gimbal stabilizer
15,288Fans
2,939Followers
51Followers
333Followers
6,170Subscribers
588Followers
54Subscribers
722Subscribers

Subscribe to Receive New Posts (Low-Traffic)

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

START HERE TO GET YOUR GEAR AT THE B&H STORE

B&H Search Banner Small
B&H Photo - Video - Pro Audio

Advertisement
  • RECENT REVIEWS AT FOCUSPULLING

The Latest from Your RigShots

Follow FocusPulling (.com)'s board RigShots on Pinterest.
© Copyright 2015 by Zen Violence Films LLC, all rights reserved. To read the site privacy policy and ethics statement, click here.